Specifically, the IGP, in his suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/554/2018, prayed the court to bar the Senate from taking further steps with regards to a resolution it reached on May 9, wherein it purportedly passed a vote of no confidence on him.
It will be recalled that Senate had in the said resolution, declared the police boss as unfit for any public office, following his repeated refusal to appear before it to answer questions pertaining to the spate of killings across the country and the inhuman treatment allegedly meted out on the lawmaker representing Kogi West, Senator Dino Melaye.
Insisting that the action of the IGP was a threat to democracy, the Senate declared him persona non grata and resolved to notify the international community, embassies, the country’s international partners and Interpol of its decision.
However, the IGP dismissed the resolution against him as a deliberate blackmail and witch-hunt, insisting he had backing of the law to send a senior officer of the Force of the Rank of Deputy Inspector General of Police or an Assistant Inspector General of Police to represent him before the Senate.
In the suit he filed through his lawyer, Dr. Alex Iziyon, SAN, the IGP specifically applied for, “An order of Perpetual Injunction restraining the respondents, whether by itself, or through its servant, agents and or privies, whatsoever from acting on the said resolution contained in the gazette dated 9th May, 2018 or causing same to be acted upon by any person or authority or government agency, or carrying out similar or like resolution against the applicant”.
He equally sought a declaration that the respondents acted ultra vires its Powers under section 88 and 89 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) in the votes and proceedings leading to the resolution contained in the gazette dated May 9, 2018, imposing a penal sanction on the applicant.
As well as an order of court quashing the entire votes and proceedings and by implication, the resolution of the Senate that led to the resolution contained in the gazette declaring him as enemy of democracy and unfit to hold any public office within and outside Nigeria.
He argued that the respondents lacked the competence and or jurisdiction to impose penal sanction on him under section 88 and 89 of the Nigerian constitution, adding that the conduct of the respondents throughout the votes and proceedings that led to the said resolution contained in the gazette was palpable of bias, deep rooted prejudiced, visible hatred and disguised contempt for the applicant.
The IGP contended that action of the Senate constituted a legislative judgment.
In a 15-paragraphed affidavit he filed in support of the suit, Idris, told the court that he received the respondents letter dated April 25 inviting him to appear before the Senate.
Idris said he could not honour the invitation because of his engagement in a trip involving the President, and consequently delegated his subordinate, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Operations and to others whom according to him had “adequate direct knowledge of the two subject matters” relating to the invitation.
He said the respondents however refused to accept his representatives and adjourned plenary to 2nd May, 2018, “with a stern warning that the applicant must appear or face the consequences.
According to the IGP, based on the above development, the respondents passed the said resolution declaring him an enemy of democracy and someone unfit to hold any public office within and outside Nigeria.
Meanwhile, Justice John Tsoho has ordered service of the relevant court processes on the respondents through the Clerk of the National Assembly, even as the case was adjourned to June 27 for hearing.
