Two witnesses of Senator Bassey Albert claimed to have collected vehicles for him in the alleged money laundering trial by Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
In the case brought before Justice Agatha A. Okeke of the Federal High Court, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission continued with the cross examination of defence witnesses on Monday, February 7.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had at the last sitting closed its case, while the defendant was ordered to open his defence.
At Monday’s sitting, the defence called two witnesses, Kubiat Etah and Kennedy Ekong, who were cross examined by prosecuting counsel, Attah Ocholi.
The witnesses, under cross examination, claimed they were members of the defendant’s campaign team and that they each received buses for campaign purposes.
Read also:
- How Senator Bassey Akpan Received N204m Vehicles From Omokore– EFCC Alleges
- Court Orders Sen Bassey To Enter Defence Over Alleged N204m Fraud
- Sen Bassey Albert Granted Bail Over Alleged Corruption Charge
However, they were unable to disclose the particulars of the vehicles and also did not state whether they personally took possession of the vehicles.
Asked whether they knew the nature of the transaction between the defendant and one Jide Omokore, the witnesses said ‘no’. They also said they were not privy to the procurement of the vehicles.
Justice Okeke adjourned the case till 10th and 15th February, 2022 for continuation of defence.
EFCC is prosecuting Senator Albert Bassey on six counts of Money Laundering, arising from the allegation that he took possession of six vehicles worth N204 Million, at the instance of one Olajide Omokore, whose companies had contracts with the State Government, at the time.
Investigations revealed that the said vehicles were proceeds of crime and that he committed the offence while he served as Commissioner for Finance, Akwa Ibom State and Chairman of Akwa Ibom State Inter-Ministerial Direct Labour Coordinating Committee, in December 2012.
The offence contravenes Section 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15 (3) of the same Act.
