Retired Directors of AKBC
We sincerely appreciate thoughtful explanations and the effort to situate this decision within a broader reform agenda. We do not doubt the good intentions behind the proposed repositioning of state-owned institutions.
However, we must respectfully express our deep reservations about the renaming of Akwa Ibom Broadcasting Corporation to Ibom Broadcasting Corporation (AKBC).
First, AKBC is not just a name – it is a legacy institution, deeply rooted in the history, identity, and collective consciousness of our people since the creation of Akwa Ibom State in 1987. Over the years, it has built credibility, emotional connection, and brand equity that cannot be easily replicated or transferred. In branding, such intangible assets are invaluable and should be preserved, not diluted.
Also read:
- AKBC Casual workers groan under non-regularisation, economic hardships- Findings
- OAP Death: She Was An Asset To Broadcasting Industry- Says AKBC DG
- Akwa Ibom Govt, Media Guru Consultant Seal Pact for ultra-modern AKBC studio
Second, while the intention to build a unified “Ibom” brand architecture may be strategically appealing, branding must not come at the expense of heritage and public trust. Strong global and national institutions – such as BBC, NTA, Radio Nigeria, and Voice of Nigeria – have maintained their names over decades, even while undergoing significant modernization and reforms. Their strength lies not only in structure and funding but in the consistency of their identity.
Third, the argument that renaming is part of commercialization raises a critical question:
Is a name change truly the primary driver of efficiency, profitability, and service delivery? Experience shows that institutional performance is more directly influenced by governance, funding, technology, and human capital – not nomenclature. A well-funded and properly managed AKBC will outperform a poorly managed “Ibom Broadcasting Corporation,” regardless of branding.
Fourth, there is a risk of unintended identity erosion. The term “Akwa Ibom” carries political, cultural, and historical significance that “Ibom” alone may not fully convey in formal institutional representation. The broadcasting corporation, as a public voice, should reflect the full identity of the State it serves.
Fifth, change management requires broad stakeholder buy-in, especially from professionals, staff, and the general public who have sustained the institution over time. Strong opposition from these groups should not be dismissed as mere sentimentality – it is a signal that the emotional and symbolic implications of this decision are profound.
Let us emphasize:
We are not opposed to reform, modernization, or commercialization. Indeed, we strongly support improvements in funding, equipment, training, and governance. However, these objectives can be achieved without altering a name that already commands recognition, trust, and loyalty.
If alignment with the “Ibom” brand is considered essential, a more balanced approach could be explored – such as:
Retaining “Akwa Ibom Broadcasting Corporation ,AKBC, as the official name
Introducing “Ibom” as a sub-brand, slogan, or commercial identity layer
This way, we preserve heritage while embracing innovation.
In conclusion, institutions thrive not just on strategy, but on identity, memory, and public confidence. AKBC represents all three. Reform it, strengthen it, modernize it – but do not rename it in a way that risks disconnecting it from its roots.
Respectfully, this is not resistance to change – it is a call for thoughtful, balanced, and identity-conscious reform.
By Retired Directors of AKBC
April 2026
